|
Post by easystrider on Mar 27, 2024 19:34:48 GMT -5
Funny how Adrian is implying he was first to stand up against Pixonic... hmmm... but nobody knew it. LOL! Right, that was pretty rich. He never made a video about it and didn't tell nobody, then follows up by bitterly stating that nobody followed. How on earth would anybody follow him if nobody knew about it? He acts as if not having giveaways is the only way to stand up to Pixonic and he was the first and only one to do it. Giveaways are freebies that allow budget spenders to keep up with the game, not having them is hurting players, not Pixonic. Then he has that part which starts with "think about it logically" followed by quite bizarre logic: asking people to support a petition is... bullying them. But I have to stop here before I get accused of "hatred and toxicity".
|
|
|
Post by Wolfblood7 on Mar 29, 2024 7:05:32 GMT -5
Wow. Interesting read.
I will say there is a lot more to the story that didn't go public. I won't reveal too much because I'm not sure I'm allowed to, but the reason I pulled out is because Manni knew he was getting banned before the idea of the petition was even in the picture. I'm not saying it's true, but it looked like he was going to use it as revenge, and bring down as many channels as he could with him.
Manni broke their rules several times, about the D-Gems video and the DenisFox one, and to be honest most of his content is negative towards the game, and I can understand why they would want to disassociate with him. One of their mentors hating on the game wasn't a good image.
What I will add is that the other creators wanted to seriously rework the petition, because not everyone agreed with all posting a video at the same time. But Manni just blasted ahead and posted, accusing all the creators of being too chicken to follow. There were talks of proposing our motions more professionally, instead of all posting which would look like an attack rather than asking for change.
To me it seems he has reached the end of his tether, because he's just throwing his channel away. By playing mech arena or whatever it was in his ban video just goes to show how little he cares about it in my opinion.
If I had 440k subscribers I would have done things a lot differently that's for sure.
|
|
|
Post by dinnerplain on Mar 29, 2024 8:54:30 GMT -5
because he's just throwing his channel away. By playing mech arena or whatever it was in his ban video just goes to show how little he cares about it in my opinion. If I had 440k subscribers I would have done things a lot differently that's for sure.
He's throwing it away because he's saying it like it is? He's talking like a player, not a mouthpiece of Pixonic.
That's kind of refreshing and maybe his subscribers won't mind it, even if Pixonic do.
|
|
|
Post by easystrider on Mar 29, 2024 10:01:14 GMT -5
Wow. Interesting read. I will say there is a lot more to the story that didn't go public. I won't reveal too much because I'm not sure I'm allowed to, but the reason I pulled out is because Manni knew he was getting banned before the idea of the petition was even in the picture. I'm not saying it's true, but it looked like he was going to use it as revenge, and bring down as many channels as he could with him. Thank you for posting your perspective, especially valuable you being a content creator yourself. Obviously not a content creator myself so I cannot fully understand the position some of you are in, but sorry, the "revenge" argument just doesn't fly with me. I read carefully and signed the petition and there was absolutely nothing in there that would be offensive or crossing the line. Many players seem to be in agreement since 80-90% who opined so far agree with all the points raised in the petition. Not sure how participating in promoting of this petition would bring down other channels, unless of course you admit that Pixonic is unreasonable and vindictive company. Also, thinking that somehow submitting videos all at once is somehow an attack is already adopting mindset deferential to Pixonic. It must be true then what Manni mentioned in his video, that some of you wanted to ask Pixonic for permission first to do this petition.(!!!) What I'm saying is that given the nature of the petition Manni's transgressions and flaws, whatever they might have been, are almost irrelevant here. Changing the game is your common cause, Manni is only important as far as numbers of views he can bring in support of it. Of course it's just my opinion but the way it played out brings out terrible optics for some of you, that is you got intimidated by Pixonic and backed out using Manni situation as an excuse. "What I will add is that the other creators wanted to seriously rework the petition, because not everyone agreed with all posting a video at the same time. But Manni just blasted ahead and posted, accusing all the creators of being too chicken to follow. There were talks of proposing our motions more professionally, instead of all posting which would look like an attack rather than asking for change." I look forward to this other professional effort then. You object to way Manni did things, fine, do it your way. But mind you, everybody speaking separately on the topic in way that doesn't hurt Pixonic's feelings has been tried plenty of times before. And sure, if I had a YT channel and 440k subs I would have done things differently too. But the question is, could Manni have gotten to 440k to begin with without speaking his mind like that? A lot of Manni's viewers will agree that he is not the best player ever, sometimes his "good mood" channel contains more ranting than good mood but at the end of the day many feel that he will speak about game's problems, even if it makes Pixonic unhappy.
|
|
|
Post by easystrider on Mar 29, 2024 10:19:09 GMT -5
And one other thing that I want to throw out there: the timing by Manni gets brought out here often. Fair enough, maybe he did have an ulterior motive.
But is anybody pausing to consider Pixonic's timing? I mean Manni was being Manni for years, he had rant videos and made mistakes about game's features long time before this. So Pixonic was tolerating all this for years and now that they get a wind of this petition they decide to ban him the day before? Maybe reading too much into things, but seems like a move designed to divide the YT community. And if that was the intent, it has to be admitted that it worked well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Karma:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2024 11:45:44 GMT -5
It's truly a shame that we can't just have a "game" w/out all the drama. Drama that Pixonic has caused. It makes you wonder if even the drama is purposeful. After all, even negative press is still press. Funny how Adrian is implying he was first to stand up against Pixonic... hmmm... but nobody knew it. LOL! Predator has a vid out today. Smacks of this theory. Dude is being a troll to get views i think. Also Manny is putting out more vids for this game than ever before... No such thing as good or bad press.... Its all press.... Has some merit....but i think in todays world one must remember nothing is forgotten......
|
|
|
Post by Method Games[YT] on Mar 29, 2024 17:26:43 GMT -5
440k subscribers won't mean much if the game finally implodes.
Manni is smart enough to know this (amongst some others). Hence the branching out to other games. He has decided to speak out and others have decided to toe the line and feed off the teet for as long as possible. That's their choice.
I think he tried to get others to back him up for some sort of coup but not as revenge to get other channels banned, but why don't they just ban the other channel he is posting on if it's still violating game rules?
|
|
|
Post by Poopface on Mar 29, 2024 18:11:50 GMT -5
Stop. Giving. Them. Money. No U.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfblood7 on Mar 30, 2024 5:54:16 GMT -5
Wow. Interesting read. I will say there is a lot more to the story that didn't go public. I won't reveal too much because I'm not sure I'm allowed to, but the reason I pulled out is because Manni knew he was getting banned before the idea of the petition was even in the picture. I'm not saying it's true, but it looked like he was going to use it as revenge, and bring down as many channels as he could with him. Thank you for posting your perspective, especially valuable you being a content creator yourself. Obviously not a content creator myself so I cannot fully understand the position some of you are in, but sorry, the "revenge" argument just doesn't fly with me. I read carefully and signed the petition and there was absolutely nothing in there that would be offensive or crossing the line. Many players seem to be in agreement since 80-90% who opined so far agree with all the points raised in the petition. Not sure how participating in promoting of this petition would bring down other channels, unless of course you admit that Pixonic is unreasonable and vindictive company. Also, thinking that somehow submitting videos all at once is somehow an attack is already adopting mindset deferential to Pixonic. It must be true then what Manni mentioned in his video, that some of you wanted to ask Pixonic for permission first to do this petition.(!!!) What I'm saying is that given the nature of the petition Manni's transgressions and flaws, whatever they might have been, are almost irrelevant here. Changing the game is your common cause, Manni is only important as far as numbers of views he can bring in support of it. Of course it's just my opinion but the way it played out brings out terrible optics for some of you, that is you got intimidated by Pixonic and backed out using Manni situation as an excuse. "What I will add is that the other creators wanted to seriously rework the petition, because not everyone agreed with all posting a video at the same time. But Manni just blasted ahead and posted, accusing all the creators of being too chicken to follow. There were talks of proposing our motions more professionally, instead of all posting which would look like an attack rather than asking for change." I look forward to this other professional effort then. You object to way Manni did things, fine, do it your way. But mind you, everybody speaking separately on the topic in way that doesn't hurt Pixonic's feelings has been tried plenty of times before. And sure, if I had a YT channel and 440k subs I would have done things differently too. But the question is, could Manni have gotten to 440k to begin with without speaking his mind like that? A lot of Manni's viewers will agree that he is not the best player ever, sometimes his "good mood" channel contains more ranting than good mood but at the end of the day many feel that he will speak about game's problems, even if it makes Pixonic unhappy. It would have backfired on everyone if we had posted all together at the time of Manni's ban. It was very suspicious that he didn't mention his ban to anyone, in fact another person had to inform us, and that's what didn't feel right. Manni should have been honest with us from the start. Our alternative option was still in the work, but it involved speaking directly to Pixonic. We didn't really have time to set up anything because Manni just posted without consulting anyone.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfblood7 on Mar 30, 2024 5:55:45 GMT -5
And one other thing that I want to throw out there: the timing by Manni gets brought out here often. Fair enough, maybe he did have an ulterior motive. But is anybody pausing to consider Pixonic's timing? I mean Manni was being Manni for years, he had rant videos and made mistakes about game's features long time before this. So Pixonic was tolerating all this for years and now that they get a wind of this petition they decide to ban him the day before? Maybe reading too much into things, but seems like a move designed to divide the YT community. And if that was the intent, it has to be admitted that it worked well. He wasn't banned the day before the petition. The main reason he was banned because he called the D-Gems a "cryptocurrency" in his original video. That's what others were saying. And his DenisFox video really didn't go down well.
|
|
|
Post by dinnerplain on Mar 30, 2024 6:14:51 GMT -5
He wasn't banned the day before the petition. The main reason he was banned because he called the D-Gems a "cryptocurrency" in his original video. That's what others were saying. And his DenisFox video really didn't go down well.
That's a pretty silly thing to ban Manni over, more like Pixonic wanted to for ages and just used that as an excuse "now" and chose the time themselves.
(D-Gems aren't cryptocurrency, they're game currency.)
|
|
|
Post by easystrider on Mar 30, 2024 7:49:02 GMT -5
And one other thing that I want to throw out there: the timing by Manni gets brought out here often. Fair enough, maybe he did have an ulterior motive. But is anybody pausing to consider Pixonic's timing? I mean Manni was being Manni for years, he had rant videos and made mistakes about game's features long time before this. So Pixonic was tolerating all this for years and now that they get a wind of this petition they decide to ban him the day before? Maybe reading too much into things, but seems like a move designed to divide the YT community. And if that was the intent, it has to be admitted that it worked well. He wasn't banned the day before the petition. Yup, that's some sloppiness on my part. I had in my mind Adrian's comment how he found out the day before and somehow the two got conflated. Obviously if the ban happened even before petition was conceived my entire theory there is out of the window. Thanks for correcting the record.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfblood7 on Mar 30, 2024 12:09:24 GMT -5
He wasn't banned the day before the petition. Yup, that's some sloppiness on my part. I had in my mind Adrian's comment how he found out the day before and somehow the two got conflated. Obviously if the ban happened even before petition was conceived my entire theory there is out of the window. Thanks for correcting the record. It was just too risky to post. And the fact Manni tried to hide his ban was suspicious. If he really cared about what he claimed in the petition he would have waited for all the creators to actually agree on something before posting.
|
|
|
Post by easystrider on Mar 30, 2024 17:51:17 GMT -5
... Our alternative option was still in the work, but it involved speaking directly to Pixonic. We didn't really have time to set up anything because Manni just posted without consulting anyone. I like the idea of doing petition much better since it involves players too. Not that I'm dismissing your idea, but it's more narrow in scope and can be done at any time. I hope you still go ahead with it.
|
|
|
Post by easystrider on Mar 30, 2024 18:14:24 GMT -5
Yup, that's some sloppiness on my part. I had in my mind Adrian's comment how he found out the day before and somehow the two got conflated. Obviously if the ban happened even before petition was conceived my entire theory there is out of the window. Thanks for correcting the record. It was just too risky to post. And the fact Manni tried to hide his ban was suspicious. If he really cared about what he claimed in the petition he would have waited for all the creators to actually agree on something before posting. If you think it was risky to post then you pretty much admit fear of retaliation from Pixonic. That explains why so many of you wanted to blunt the message (or back out altogether). If I were in Manni's position I would have done the same thing and moved on with petition, for exactly the reason of how that process went. There's an idea of petition, but some of you wanted to change it into direct talks, some wanted to post at their own convenience, some wanted to ask Pixo for permission first, some thought it would be an "attack" and so on. Nothing or very little would have gotten done in the end. But that's water under the bridge. Manni got his petition out and a lot of you showed that you had nothing to do with it, so I don't think you should be concerned about Pixonic's reaction. Now you can show how much you care and proceed with your idea.
|
|
|
Post by easystrider on Mar 30, 2024 18:22:51 GMT -5
He wasn't banned the day before the petition. The main reason he was banned because he called the D-Gems a "cryptocurrency" in his original video. That's what others were saying. And his DenisFox video really didn't go down well.
That's a pretty silly thing to ban Manni over, more like Pixonic wanted to for ages and just used that as an excuse "now" and chose the time themselves.
(D-Gems aren't cryptocurrency, they're game currency.)
I do wonder why Pixonic would take an offense to comparing anything in game to cryptocurrency. I mean, crypto-currency is something that has exorbitant prices and probably soon will be worthless and in game items... Yeah, see no comparison whatsoever.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfblood7 on Mar 30, 2024 20:07:39 GMT -5
It was just too risky to post. And the fact Manni tried to hide his ban was suspicious. If he really cared about what he claimed in the petition he would have waited for all the creators to actually agree on something before posting. If you think it was risky to post then you pretty much admit fear of retaliation from Pixonic. That explains why so many of you wanted to blunt the message (or back out altogether). If I were in Manni's position I would have done the same thing and moved on with petition, for exactly the reason of how that process went. There's an idea of petition, but some of you wanted to change it into direct talks, some wanted to post at their own convenience, some wanted to ask Pixo for permission first, some thought it would be an "attack" and so on. Nothing or very little would have gotten done in the end. But that's water under the bridge. Manni got his petition out and a lot of you showed that you had nothing to do with it, so I don't think you should be concerned about Pixonic's reaction. Now you can show how much you care and proceed with your idea. I don't think many people wanted to be seen as working with Manni, because of his ban. It wasn't that we were scared of Pixonic silencing us for the petition, I personally was worried about getting tarred with the same brush as Manni content-wise. Most of his recent videos have just been hate videos on the game. Personally I don't think that's a very good way to tackle the bigger issues. I try to focus on some positive aspects in my content because I believe there is still some enjoyment in the game. I don't really blame Pixonic for taking action against Manni, because it was true most of his content portrayed them in a negative light, and having one of their mentors do that obviously didn't look good. Also, there would have probably been no need to ask Pixonic about the petition (yes I believe a couple creators gave them a heads up, I didn't, not going to name any) if Manni hadn't have been banned. I'm in no way scared of posting a controversial video, I've done my 100 reasons why the game is bad series, and had nothing said about it by Pixonic. But in a way Manni killed the petition by getting himself banned. It just looked bad and a group ordeal from the creators at the time of Manni's ban would have looked like an attack, and I personally couldn't take the risk of it looking like I was siding with him when he was clearly in the wrong. I can't speak for the others though, they probably had other reasons. I don't know what the plan is moving forward, because our plans for another attempt at getting change were destroyed when Manni posted his original petition video. He pretty much slagged off all the creators, making us look weak for not posting. It was suspicious to me that he didn't even want to take another attempt at the petition once we found out about his ban. It seemed to me he had decided his fate already.So even if we did try something now, it just wouldn't have the desired effect, instead people would be focusing on the "drama" between the creators rather than the actual issue of asking for change. I'll try to summarise my main reasons why I pulled out. Manni deciding not to tell anyone about his ban which he knew about before the petition triggered alarm bells for me. That was suspicious for a start. The fact that it could be seen as a revenge attack on the game put me off too, because the point of it was to ask for change. Manni seemingly wanting to go down a martyr rather than actually rework the petition idea with all the creators agreeing on a format finished it for me. I was actually the last person to pull out, and I'll admit it was a hard decision. I just don't think it would have worked, especially at the time where there was a lot of tension from Manni's ban. It's a shame, because all the creators pulling together might have done something.
|
|
|
Post by easystrider on Mar 30, 2024 23:10:45 GMT -5
I think the petition was quite good and there was a decent response to it. I don't think absence of other content creators harmed it that much, it's just that it would have have been nice to have broader support. I would reiterate that petition was about the game, not about Manni, so any involvement in it would not associate you with him. But I accept that you see it differently. Second, I would not worry about how this dispute is making you look or others. Simply put, very few people care. Of all people playing small fraction is watching YT videos about the game, tiny fraction posting about it on the forum. Possibly a handful of people are even remotely interested in any kind of interaction between youtubers. Look at his very thread, very few distinct posters and most only weakly following what's going on. I do see how this experience has put you off, I can somewhat relate to it. Among top youtubers that I used to watch is one notorious game-quitter. Had misfortune of bumping into him in War Robots Frontiers where I don't think he finished a single game I played against him. That to me is much worse transgression against the game than any other alleged here. I would have found him giving input on how to improve the game quite comical but hey, let the bygones be bygones.
|
|
|
Post by dinnerplain on Mar 31, 2024 7:02:35 GMT -5
I don't think many people wanted to be seen as working with Manni, because of his ban. It wasn't that we were scared of Pixonic silencing us for the petition, I personally was worried about getting tarred with the same brush as Manni content-wise. Most of his recent videos have just been hate videos on the game. Personally I don't think that's a very good way to tackle the bigger issues. I try to focus on some positive aspects in my content because I believe there is still some enjoyment in the game. I don't really blame Pixonic for taking action against Manni, because it was true most of his content portrayed them in a negative light, and having one of their mentors do that obviously didn't look good.
The only way to get something to change is to complain about it and point out the negative things. Don't solve the problems, just highlight them.
If you continue to ignore the bigger issues and just keep positing positive things, nothing will change, because why would Pixonic be motivated to fix anything? If you continue to blow smoke up Pixonic's 「bum-bum」 then nothing will change. Nothing.
The mindset you and the other content creators have is the complete opposite of what's needed to bring about change.
What do you think would happen if a significant number of the Pixonic content creators started posting videos about how to download and use cheats, where to get them, how cool they are, etc? Besides you getting banned, of course.
When governments start failing their constituents, they either get voted out or people start protesting and demanding change. Russians that didn't believe in the Ukraine invasion were willing to risk jail to complain about the invasion. What are you willing to put on the line to demand change in War Robots?
|
|
|
Post by dinnerplain on Mar 31, 2024 7:38:28 GMT -5
In other parts of the software industry, companies offer "bug bounties" to people that can find security vulnerabilities in software. There are clearing houses and registries of security issues in software. This provides people with an incentive to find issues as well as motivating companies to fix them.
Maybe it is time something like that happened for software cheats/exploits in games.
|
|
|
Post by 079 on Mar 31, 2024 11:20:51 GMT -5
I don't think many people wanted to be seen as working with Manni, because of his ban. It wasn't that we were scared of Pixonic silencing us for the petition, I personally was worried about getting tarred with the same brush as Manni content-wise. Most of his recent videos have just been hate videos on the game. Personally I don't think that's a very good way to tackle the bigger issues. I try to focus on some positive aspects in my content because I believe there is still some enjoyment in the game. I don't really blame Pixonic for taking action against Manni, because it was true most of his content portrayed them in a negative light, and having one of their mentors do that obviously didn't look good.
The only way to get something to change is to complain about it and point out the negative things. Don't solve the problems, just highlight them.
If you continue to ignore the bigger issues and just keep positing positive things, nothing will change, because why would Pixonic be motivated to fix anything? If you continue to blow smoke up Pixonic's 「bum-bum」 then nothing will change. Nothing.
The mindset you and the other content creators have is the complete opposite of what's needed to bring about change.
What do you think would happen if a significant number of the Pixonic content creators started posting videos about how to download and use cheats, where to get them, how cool they are, etc? Besides you getting banned, of course.
When governments start failing their constituents, they either get voted out or people start protesting and demanding change. Russians that didn't believe in the Ukraine invasion were willing to risk jail to complain about the invasion. What are you willing to put on the line to demand change in War Robots?
You would think that, but for better or for worse, there is a significant amount of nuance in delivering meaningful, constructive criticism. Too little criticism and said criticism does not land, but too much bashing and negativity, and it also does not land. You often need to demonstrate that you care about and have solid ideas on how to improve the game, not just be constantly whining about seemingly everything. Regardless of how justified said whining is, if it is too aggressive to Pixonic then they will just dismiss you as a hater, which I think these YouTubers understand. This is not a democracy, so the only way to get Pixonic to listen is if we genuinely appeal to them, not just scream and whine until something happens. As for the Ukraine comparison, I disagree honestly. Caring for a game you spend your free time on and being patriotic for your homeland and livelihood are two very different things. I think it is completely understandable for people to not want to get overly invested in War Robots drama and maintain a less demanding relationship with the game.
|
|
|
Post by easystrider on Mar 31, 2024 13:13:46 GMT -5
The only way to get something to change is to complain about it and point out the negative things. Don't solve the problems, just highlight them.
If you continue to ignore the bigger issues and just keep positing positive things, nothing will change, because why would Pixonic be motivated to fix anything? If you continue to blow smoke up Pixonic's 「bum-bum」 then nothing will change. Nothing.
The mindset you and the other content creators have is the complete opposite of what's needed to bring about change.
What do you think would happen if a significant number of the Pixonic content creators started posting videos about how to download and use cheats, where to get them, how cool they are, etc? Besides you getting banned, of course.
When governments start failing their constituents, they either get voted out or people start protesting and demanding change. Russians that didn't believe in the Ukraine invasion were willing to risk jail to complain about the invasion. What are you willing to put on the line to demand change in War Robots?
... As for the Ukraine comparison, I disagree honestly. Caring for a game you spend your free time on and being patriotic for your homeland and livelihood are two very different things. I think it is completely understandable for people to not want to get overly invested in War Robots drama and maintain a less demanding relationship with the game. Right, these two are of completely different weight. I think though what was meant there is general question of how much one is willing to sacrifice to achieve change. This is probably a topic for another discussion, but being on this forum I sometimes wondered why sometimes people (myself included) respond so strongly to what is happening in War Robots. What I came up is that what Pixo is doing violating people's sense of justice and fairness. And that is triggering emotions normally reserved for something much more important than a game.
|
|
|
Post by munkeeee on Mar 31, 2024 19:15:14 GMT -5
In the end, pix will do what they want.
|
|
Max Bacon
Destrier
Posts: 90
Karma: 179
Pilot name: Max Bacon
Platform: iOS
Clan: Bad Eggs
League: Champion
Favorite robot: Loki
|
Post by Max Bacon on Mar 31, 2024 19:54:53 GMT -5
I am not sure of the exact timing, but Manni was posting content from his Battle Rec account not too long before he announced the ban/released the petition. And it was a rather positive review of the Typhon with Ultimate Orkans. He also seems extremely positive about the new map that's about to be released. So I'd not characterize him as overwhelmingly negative. Rather I'd characterize him as too honest.
Personally, I've become completely jaded with content producers using War Robots Battle Rec accounts. I'm likely in the minority here, but I'd much rather see just how to not spend too much, and yet not get insta-killed in Champs. So videos featuring non-vault and non-legendary content and not full Mk3. I long for the days of Stew Pendous and a little watched yet skilled creator named SOLVM.
For what it's worth, when I first started playing and then watching War Robots content, I blew Manni off as too much of a cheerleader, and that he mostly appealed to an audience about 50 years younger than me. Now, I truly believe that he's the voice of the f2p or minnow spender. I wish him the best, and hope that he's able to thrive by producing videos featuring his personal account.
As to the other creators that worked on the petition, yet withdrew because of timing and/or feeling its content wasn't just right - I'm waiting to see just what they manage to produce. I'm hoping it will manage to eclipse that petition that Manni produced.
|
|
|
Post by gus169 on Mar 31, 2024 20:52:08 GMT -5
I think all of the endorsed content creators are walking a tightrope here. Falling to the left sees them cancelled by the playerbase. To the right, by Pixo. I don't envy them the free gear, or whatever money they make. We're all 'only human' and I don't want to judge their choices from the sideline. None of this affects my gaming.
|
|
|
Post by munkeeee on Mar 31, 2024 21:24:50 GMT -5
I think all of the endorsed content creators are walking a tightrope here. Falling to the left sees them cancelled by the playerbase. To the right, by Pixo. I don't envy them the free gear, or whatever money they make. We're all 'only human' and I don't want to judge their choices from the sideline. None of this affects my gaming. None of this affects my gaming.Well spoken good sir.
|
|
|
Post by tabbylion on Apr 1, 2024 8:12:24 GMT -5
Predator gives his side of the story:
|
|
|
Post by easystrider on Apr 1, 2024 10:02:42 GMT -5
Predator gives his side of the story: Wow, 36 minute video. He reinforces a lot what we already heard in this thread. Agree that going after other creators like that was pretty bad move on Manni's part. I'll just come back to this one thing: why was it that majority wanted to postpone releasing petition? It was not even originated by Manni going by the above, it was a common effort and release date was agreed on. How was Manni's ban relevant here? Why was there an "alternative" effort going on in trying to talk to Pixonic and etc? I still believe other content creators should have went ahead with petition as planned and dealt with Manni, whatever the grievances, afterwards. That way he would have gotten the brunt of the anger (if there was any), not others. Bottom line: predator is working on another effort similar to petition. Thumbs up, the rest is peanuts.
|
|
|
Post by easystrider on Apr 1, 2024 12:18:49 GMT -5
We already have a response: "About Predators video: My choice of words during that live-stream was bad. I also wasn't happy, myself with how I responded there. When being asked on the spot about something imporant while doing live-gameplay, maybe it's better sometimes NOT to answer and find the right words, first. Because if you don't something like this can happen: You'll be quoted at your worst moment." You can read the rest pinned to his latest video, one where he announces he is buying War Robots. Happy April Fool's day all.
|
|
|
Post by 079 on Apr 1, 2024 12:57:38 GMT -5
Predator posting this video today of all days unfortunately means who is genuine and who is joking will be called into question, but I do think his video raises some good points. Manni antagonizing the other creators is counterproductive and honestly what Pixonic wants, as it means he can be easily exiled from the wider community and have his thoughts be disregarded. I already have the impression that he is too far gone by this point, and will just rant and rave until he burns out or something does actually change. Sad to see him reduce himself to a toxic broken record, but at he is providing an outlet for player frustration at the end of the day.
|
|