|
Post by ChillyTempurrrrr on Apr 15, 2017 1:18:24 GMT -5
Today CREEPYPETS was banned for "sockpuppeting" which as of this post means: Now here's the problem.In the english dictionary malicious means:"characterized by malice; intending or intended to do harm" CREEPYPETS in his thread found here: war-robots-forum.freeforums.net/thread/5137/hi-all-back-sorry-troubles?page=1&scrollTo=87313States that he won't mess up again which means that this sockpuppeting account is not being used for malicious reasons and therefore he had not broken any rules on the code of conduct. Pic of code conduct:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Karma:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2017 1:27:17 GMT -5
He's going to say creepy was hammerbanned for trying to get around his week long ban, not for malicious sock puppetting.
|
|
|
Post by Strayed on Apr 15, 2017 1:40:48 GMT -5
Creepypets attempted to get past the ban.
Sockpuppeting doesn't just mean attempting to get past a ban.
And quite frankly, it would be unfair to the others if we let Creepypets ignore the rules just because he said that he wasn't going to break the rules again. He was already breaking the rules by circumventing his ban. Actions speak louder than words.
|
|
|
Post by ŞĆĦŇIŦŽ€Ł on Apr 15, 2017 2:29:29 GMT -5
Adding to Strayed's post, can you imagine the outrage we'd get if we let him off just because he said he wouldn't do it again? Forumers would start flipping tables
|
|
|
Post by SuperHero on Apr 15, 2017 2:40:21 GMT -5
It was a one week ban. If he could not even have the patience to wait it out, then how can we trust him anyway?
|
|
|
Post by ŞĆĦŇIŦŽ€Ł on Apr 15, 2017 2:45:51 GMT -5
It was a one week ban. If he could not even have the patience to wait it out, then how can we trust him anyway? His ban would have been lifted on the 18th, just 3 more days.
|
|