Inquisitor: Ember vs. Redeemer test

Don't you think that you should put here a description of some kind?

Cool, always figured ember was so much more powerful. Im happy with my redeemer.

I like the Redeemer. Ember does have the benefits of going through all shield types but on a faster moving target you're going to miss alot more than on a Redeemer. Ember has the fear factor. When you see a huge flame shooting at you you tend to run. Not many people go "O no it's a Redeemer"

I use the Taran/Redeemer setup on my second Lance. He will get shallacked except as used as a backup. Same as an Inquis does though after it's Descend wears off. At least my Lance stops plasma for awhile.

Does anybody use Zeus on Inquisitor? With two scourges, for example. This build doesn't seem to have many fans, is there some obvious flaw with it that I'm missing?

Considered that too and I even have available lancelot. It's just that... slowness of lance turns me off. But I'll give it some more thought.  

They both have advantages and disadvantages (according to wiki)

Burst dps - Draw. (Ember has higher dps, but redeemer seems doing the same burst dps due to Ember’s fire slower travel speed)
Cycle damage - Ember (Ember 147000 vs Redeemer 102000)
Projectile Speed - Redeemer (Ember’s fire has slowest travel speed in War Robots)
Ignore shield - Ember (Ember ignore all shield while Redeemer only ignore energy shield)
Upgrade cost and time - Ember (they have same upgrade time but Ember cheaper to upgrade)

Choose the weapon for your need, I don’t think one is way better than the other. It really depends what bot you up against.

I am going to try Exodus/Orkan when Exodus come out, better version of DB Griffin.

Anyone tested dragoon taran inq? Im kinda inclined towards it since you can punch up close and still deal damage 600m away. No scourges for me yet so tarans will do.

You can add 2 more on the Ember side:
1. Fire wall - I killed many bots chasing me around the corner... they couldn't hit me because of no LOS, but they "walked in fire" till death.
2. Fire (projectiles) don't have to hit center of the bot as with Redeemer/Taran. It's like splash for Orkans. Countless times I poured "river of fire" to the KOTH beacon and almost always I popped at least 1-2 bots hiding behind posts. Not to say you don't want to stay next to the beacon when you see fire flowing your way.

But, anyway, I will test Redeemer

This is my current build on my Inquis. Inquis is better as you can jump (Descend) and hit people whereas the Lance can't. I used to run a Dragoon instead but the Zeus is more accurate and instant damage. Inquis also is not as good a brawler as a Lance in my opinion. I leave my Lances at an Ancilot and a Lance with a Redeemer.  

Thank you for this.

 Not using an inquisitor, yet. But, my Carnage with dual Zeus was embarassingly limited on kills, even back in Gold League.

 The damage sucks, the reload sucks and it also makes you a very visible target when you light up.

I run an Inquisitor with Dragoon/Tarans. The extra 250 meters has saved my life quite a few times when other pilots think they are closing in for the kill. I tried it with the Ember, but a single one often doesn't provide the burst damage to get the job done fast enough. Of course, whenever I can acquire an Exodus, I'll move to pairing with Orkans.

I hate the Ember, mine is all 11 and I just dont get this idea that it's doing major damage. Maybe it's just after jumping and trying to hit Dash bots and other fast moving things. I loved the Zeus/Scourge. Once I get a Dragoon past level 6 I'll reeveluate.