|
|
Post by moses on Apr 8, 2018 6:02:22 GMT -5
assistance needed to assess why the mass of words containing a certain three letters are being misclassified as embarrassing to the assembled masses. I assume the censorship tool assesses the combination of letters regardless of their association with the assorted common phrases.
|
|
|
|
Post by moses on Apr 8, 2018 6:05:00 GMT -5
Interesting. It seems that my ASSumption was off the mark and only certain instances are censored. Plural is the problem.
|
|
|
|
Post by moses on Apr 8, 2018 6:05:53 GMT -5
Mass is ok, but masses are not
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Karma:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2018 6:23:09 GMT -5
S「total babe」horpe council had the same problem years ago. It took them about a week to realise why they weren't receiving e-mail. Curse you bad language filter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Paps on Apr 8, 2018 9:19:35 GMT -5
Retardant was a no-go a while back. As in, flame-retardant foam/suit etc.
Dunno if it still is or no.
Edit: Guess that one got fixed.
|
|
