Well done Pix. You've done it again.

I think he was just pointing out the confused labelling

Titan reapers comming in 10.0 update. They brought the bendies for titans, reapers are next. You heard it here first.

The Ultimate Ming is "A" tier IMO (which I count as "great") and the regular Ming is "B" tier (good/okay). No, Ming doesn't want defense in flight, that wouldn't help. Personal experience against them also isn't a good metric because nobody plays it correctly. If you sit in the air like a blimp with ANY Ming it's game over. There are 2 correct ways to play it;

• If you don't have the pilot, you can use altitude adjustment tricks to poke your guns above any tall cover. You need to time it right, but it pays off, here's me doing it in rome and killing an S clan Newton duo: 
• If you do have the pilot, you'll want to be "teabaggming" ie, going up and down over and over again, spending most of your time in ground mode and flying up only at the start of an engagement. Get yourself a mothership strike and you can combo it with the stealth to have long enough stealth time to kill newtons: 

To judge a bot only by it's health bar is a silly thing to do. You don't have to take my word for the Eiffel thing: 

^{I checked their hangars to confirm they're maxxed, you can look their names up if you want to double check. It's also telling since they all have full weapon setups.}
This isn't to say Ming is better than Newton or Eiffel. It isn't. When you're using one against meta titans you have to accept that you're just at a natural disadvantage because the bot is dated. Regardless, over the course of 25 games I recorded my winrate against newtons to be about 60% and my winrate against eiffels as 5/7 (didn't see many). But Ming is underrated IMO - it doesn't deserve the hate just for having a pewny health bar. It's a glass cannon.