Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Karma:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2017 3:12:21 GMT -5
I see a lot of you are great number crunchers. I'm am most certainly not. So I humbly ask for help.
I see that the fury and the Natasha are both 110k base power & same speed so I wonder which is better for me to run. A triple tempest fury or a double tempest/double molot natasha? All weapons are lvl 7. Also with this new update is it better to slap lvl 7 gekkos on that Natasha instead of the molots? Thanks in advance for your time and brain power.
|
|
|
|
Post by seanh on Jul 12, 2017 3:20:27 GMT -5
I have no idea on the numbers but if I get a second tempest its going on the firey Natasha, it would be a shame not to use it for something. Or the sexy carnage maybe? The Gekko's will only work on the firey natasha if you get them to red, anything else would just clash and send mixed messages to the enemy.
(all aesthetics aside I would like to know the number too)
|
|
|
|
Post by SGT D00M! on Jul 12, 2017 3:31:03 GMT -5
You have three tempests? Did you win them or buy them?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Karma:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2017 3:45:28 GMT -5
You have three tempests? Did you win them or buy them? Actually I have 4. I won them, all in a row, in gold chests.  |
|
|
|
Post by hyderier on Jul 12, 2017 3:50:10 GMT -5
Well, Fury has slightly more firepower, so is definitely better. Not too much better, less difference than TT Fury vs some Trident Natasha, but still probably enough to notice.
|
|
|
|
Post by SGT D00M! on Jul 12, 2017 3:51:53 GMT -5
You have three tempests? Did you win them or buy them? Actually I have 4. I won them, all in a row, in gold chests. I hate you. Congrats on your good luck. 「illegitimate child」. |
|
|
|
Post by WilsonK on Jul 12, 2017 4:30:13 GMT -5
I see a lot of you are great number crunchers. I'm am most certainly not. So I humbly ask for help. I see that the fury and the Natasha are both 110k base power & same speed so I wonder which is better for me to run. A triple tempest fury or a double tempest/double molot natasha? All weapons are lvl 7. Also with this new update is it better to slap lvl 7 gekkos on that Natasha instead of the molots? Thanks in advance for your time and brain power. I'd say Fury to run your Tempests, and Natasha to run Gekko & Tempest, if not Pins and Tempest. |
|
|
|
Post by ΒΣRΖΣRKΛ²³ on Jul 12, 2017 4:41:31 GMT -5
Well one tempest equals 2.25 molots, so a fury has 6.75 (3x2.25) molot firepower, a Natasha has 6.5(2.25+2.25+1+1).
Pre 2.9.2, that is.
Now the tempest gets a 20% damage increase,
Motots only 15%. So the margin gets a little bigger, if you have a fury and three tempests, there is no need to Settle for the Tasha.
With no fury available the Natasha is a very good low(er) budget solution.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Karma:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2017 6:09:37 GMT -5
Well one tempest equals 2.25 molots, so a fury has 6.75 (3x2.25) molot firepower, a Natasha has 6.5(2.25+2.25+1+1). Pre 2.9.2, that is. Now the tempest gets a 20% damage increase, Motots only 15%. So the margin gets a little bigger, if you have a fury and three tempests, there is no need to Settle for the Tasha. With no fury available the Natasha is a very good low(er) budget solution. Thanks kindly for breaking that down for me. Much appreciated. |
|
|
|
Post by ΒΣRΖΣRKΛ²³ on Jul 12, 2017 6:30:13 GMT -5
Well one tempest equals 2.25 molots, so a fury has 6.75 (3x2.25) molot firepower, a Natasha has 6.5(2.25+2.25+1+1). Pre 2.9.2, that is. Now the tempest gets a 20% damage increase, Motots only 15%. So the margin gets a little bigger, if you have a fury and three tempests, there is no need to Settle for the Tasha. With no fury available the Natasha is a very good low(er) budget solution. Thanks kindly for breaking that down for me. Much appreciated. Plus there will come a new skin for the fury which is absolutely killer! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Karma:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2017 7:19:27 GMT -5
Thanks kindly for breaking that down for me. Much appreciated. Plus there will come a new skin for the fury which is absolutely killer! Do u have a pic? How much does it cost? |
|
|
|
Post by ΒΣRΖΣRKΛ²³ on Jul 12, 2017 7:57:54 GMT -5
Plus there will come a new skin for the fury which is absolutely killer! Do u have a pic? How much does it cost? You can see it around 1 minute in. Well judging by all the other latest skins probably 500 but you never know for sure.. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Karma:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2017 8:06:33 GMT -5
Do u have a pic? How much does it cost? You can see it around 1 minute in. Well judging by all the other latest skins probably 500 but you never know for sure.. Thanks again. I remember seeing that now. But I can't get it. It's the Marine skin and I spent 7 years in the Army, Infantry. I'd feel like a traitor, lol |
|
meteormash
Destrier
Posts: 34
Karma: 34
Pilot name: Meteor Mash
Platform: iOS
League: Expert
Server Region: North America
Favorite robot: Leo
|
Post by meteormash on Jul 12, 2017 8:18:14 GMT -5
I am running a Trident Fury and a Tempest/Molot Nat.
I don't like running multiples of the same bot. And I wouldn't invest in a second Fury at this time.
|
|
|
|
Post by ⓣⓡⓘⓒⓚⓨ48 on Jul 12, 2017 8:19:34 GMT -5
You can see it around 1 minute in. Well judging by all the other latest skins probably 500 but you never know for sure.. Thanks again. I remember seeing that now. But I can't get it. It's the Marine skin and I spent 7 years in the Army, Infantry. I'd feel like a traitor, lol LOL. You're safe... I am fairly certain that skin is not "marine" like the glorious, absolutely fantastic, Hard-Charging U.S. Marines from our Beloved Corps... More like "marine" in its definition meaning "pertaining to the water." |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Karma:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2017 8:34:00 GMT -5
--AT LVL 1--
Tempest Fury:
*110880 damage in total
*6653 DPS in regular firing mode, 9979 DPS in accelerated
Tempest Molot Natasha:
*106120 damage in total
*6367 DPS in regular firing mode, 9551 DPS in accelerated
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Karma:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2017 8:39:24 GMT -5
Thanks again. I remember seeing that now. But I can't get it. It's the Marine skin and I spent 7 years in the Army, Infantry. I'd feel like a traitor, lol LOL. You're safe... I am fairly certain that skin is not "marine" like the glorious, absolutely fantastic, Hard-Charging U.S. Marines from our Beloved Corps... More like "marine" in its definition meaning "pertaining to the water." It's actually the Navy's old camo that everyone made fun of. As if they needed camo on the ship. And blue at that. I seem to recall that they changed recently or are still in the process. Can't expect the Russians to get it right I suppose. |
|
|
|
Post by ⓣⓡⓘⓒⓚⓨ48 on Jul 12, 2017 9:03:45 GMT -5
Which was a marine pattern... just, again, not in a "US Marine" sense. I don't think it is a direct copy of the Navy pattern, either, just a "marine" pattern... meaning, looking like water or alluding to the look of water. In other words, I don't think you have anything to fear as far as branch disloyalty!  |
|
|
|
Post by ⓣⓡⓘⓒⓚⓨ48 on Jul 12, 2017 9:07:08 GMT -5
And yeah, no one could understand why they used that camo pattern.... it seems that the one thing it would be really good at, is hiding survivors of a wreck from rescuers, or keep men/women who may have fallen overboard from being seen very well.
Which seems less than ideal in my book lol.
|
|
