|
Post by amidf on Aug 7, 2017 19:34:48 GMT -5
It's neck and neck. But pretty low overall participation. Forum, I am disappoint.
-Amid
|
|
|
Post by 0ppressor on Aug 7, 2017 22:47:19 GMT -5
Voted "No really, see below"
AmIdoingitright?
|
|
|
Post by moody on Aug 7, 2017 22:55:36 GMT -5
I love how there is a completely useless pole here. I wonder how closely it reflects what is actually happening?
|
|
|
Post by sharpmango on Aug 8, 2017 3:30:45 GMT -5
Voted for no really see below. I prefer the mild exasperation in the sentence. Kinda describes my general approach to life.
|
|
|
Post by llama4president on Aug 8, 2017 5:49:29 GMT -5
Voted for no really see below. I prefer the mild exasperation in the sentence. Kinda describes my general approach to life.
|
|
|
Post by xXrobotrippinXx on Aug 8, 2017 6:13:38 GMT -5
Phew.. I don't have to choose.. as I only have 97 posts ?
....wait ....98
|
|
|
Post by Vindictive999 on Aug 8, 2017 8:13:44 GMT -5
Phew.. I don't have to choose.. as I only have 97 posts ? ....wait ....98 Are you sure?
|
|
|
Post by moody on Aug 8, 2017 9:06:24 GMT -5
Phew.. I don't have to choose.. as I only have 97 posts ? ....wait ....98 Are you sure? I see what you did there ?
|
|
|
Post by Poopface on Aug 8, 2017 11:41:04 GMT -5
Friends, Romans, Countrymen! Lend me your ears! We have been beset by hijinks and underhanded tomfoolery. There are attempts being made to rig the results of this poll. Those in favor of "no, really" are trying to fill the ballot box by besmirching the good, hard-fought clan name of "see below." We must not let this stand and must rise up in support of "see below."
|
|
|
Post by amidf on Aug 8, 2017 11:48:42 GMT -5
Friends, Romans, Countrymen! Lend me your ears! We have been beset by hijinks and underhanded tomfoolery. There are attempts being made to rig the results of this poll. Those in favor of "no, really" are trying to fill the ballot box by besmirching the good, hard-fought clan name of "see below." We must not let this stand and must rise up in support of "see below." How do we know this wasn't sent by a First Optioner in an attempt to besmirch the Second Option? -Amid
|
|
|
Post by Poopface on Aug 8, 2017 11:55:38 GMT -5
How do we know this wasn't sent by a First Optioner in an attempt to besmirch the Second Option? -Amid It very could have been a double-bluff. You may be onto something there. There's only one solution.
|
|
|
Post by llama4president on Aug 8, 2017 12:04:30 GMT -5
How do we know this wasn't sent by a First Optioner in an attempt to besmirch the Second Option? -Amid It very could have been a double-bluff. You may be onto something there. There's only one solution.
|
|
|
Post by llama4president on Aug 8, 2017 15:08:08 GMT -5
|
|